What we're about

  • Ilise Benun and Peleg Top
  • The Marketing Mix is the official blog of Marketing Mentor and the community that's sprung up around it.
  • We're devoted to helping small business owners, freelancers and independent professionals grow their businesses into thriving enterprises.
  • Feel free to join in the conversation: leave a comment, send us an email. Or, if you're an MM client, past or present, with the blogging bug and/or great stories to share, let us know—we're always on the lookout for guest bloggers!

Newsletter

LinkedIn

  • Peleg on LinkedIn
    View Peleg's profile on LinkedIn
  • Ilise on LinkedIn
    View Ilise Benun's profile on LinkedIn
  • Colleen on LinkedIn
    View Colleen Wainwright's profile on LinkedIn

The Mix Masters

  • ILISE BENUN is the founder of Marketing Mentor, and has been teaching people to promote themselves and their services since 1988. Author of 4 books and many, many more articles, Ilise has been self-employed for all but three years of her working life.

    More about Ilise here.

  • PELEG TOP is a partner in Marketing Mentor and the founder of Top Design, an L.A.-based industry leader in branding and cause marketing.

    More about Peleg here.

The Mix Mistress



  • COLLEEN WAINWRIGHT, a.k.a. "the communicatrix," is a Los Angeles-based writer/designer/consultant who helps entrepreneurs define and market themselves. She is a devoted adherent of the Marketing Mentor program as well as living proof that by gum, the stuff actually works.

    More about Colleen here.

Powered by TypePad

December 08, 2008

Sometimes I wish I'd become a neuroscientist

If I had discovered my interest in the brain and how it works when I was young (and if I had developed the strength of character to do the work required), I may have become a neuroscientist.

Nonetheless, I am a huge fan of Oliver Sacks and Jonah Lehrer (whose "Frontal Cortex" blog (I wish I had time to read more regularly) and I am consistently fascinated by almost any brain research I read about, especially when it relates to work.

So you can imagine my delight when I came across "In Hard Times, Fear Can Imperil Decision-Making" by neuroeconomist (that's what I could have been!), Gary Berns, in yesterday's NY Times.

It's basically about how to keep fear from short-circuiting exploration of the new and sound decision-making. Here's the crux of it:

The most concrete thing that neuroscience tells us is that when the fear system of the brain is active, exploratory activity and risk-taking are turned off. The first order of business, then, is to neutralize that system.

This means not being a fearmonger. It means avoiding people who are overly pessimistic about the economy. It means tuning out media that fan emotional flames. Unless you are a day-trader, it means closing the Web page with the market ticker. It does mean being prepared, but not being a hypervigilant, everyone-in-the-bunker type.

I don't care what your business is, but if you think it will eventually come back to what it was — your brain is in the grips of the fear-based endowment effect. What I am doing is looking for new opportunities....This strategy keeps the exploratory system of my brain active. And right now there are incredible opportunities to do something differently. Yes, they’re risky, and some will fail. But while others wait for the storm to pass, I’m busy expanding into new areas.If I wait for money to start flowing again, the opportunities will have passed.

October 24, 2008

Brand is behavior (and good news for solopreneurs)

You think you know more about marketing your small business than the big guys? PR and marketing guru extraordinaire Jonathan Salem Baskin thinks you're probably right. Baskin's new book, Branding Only Works on Cattle, is all about how the old model of marketing--building up a brand's "image" and selling it like crazy to the teeming masses--is beyond broken: it's irrelevant.

Full disclosure: Jonathan and I go way, way back; we've known each other since we were in high school, back in Chicago (although I could not find photo documentation of such...thank GOD). But frankly, that means less special treatment on the part of the interviewer, not more; I think you'll enjoy the results!

* * * * *

CW: You've got a pretty game-changing thesis about marketing in your book. Before we get to the meat of it--that brand is behavior (which I admit, I didn't "get" just by looking at it)--can you talk a bit about what branding used to be, and what started to change that?

Jsbaskin JSB: Sure. The human mind has always been a 'black box' of swirling, changing thoughts and opinions. There was a brief time in the mid-20th Century when mass media could hope to influence it, if not sometimes manipulate what consumers might aspire to do. But those days are long gone, thanks to the Internet, mobile media, do-it-yourself culture, and the birth of successive generations who've been inured to the claims of marketing. If brands were 'shorthand,' people now can access the complete versions of things, with annotation, additional content, and reviews. And then add to them.

Yet people still make choices, and they attach meaning to what they do.  So what's the best model for getting your commercial interests into that equation? It's not the old approach to branding, which doesn't work anymore (and is the reason why trust in corporations is at an all-time low, people aren't loyal anymore, and even some premium products are finding that the only branding attribute that truly matters is low price).

CW: So the solution is...?

JSB:
I say the way to address this reality is to redefine your brand as behavior.

CW: Ah! Or "duh." Can you break that down for us a bit? Into some practical, actionable things?

JSB: Definitely. Brand-as-behavior is all about action and results, not fluffy, unquantifiable stuff.

So brand as behavior can manifest itself as...

  • ...a tactic (how you communicate and illustrate what you believe is best done with actual actions, not just declarations)
  • ...a strategy (by focusing on behaviors, you can understand your customers or consumers by what they do, when they do it, what causes it, and thus better understand and forecast your branding efforts)
  • ...an ultimate goal (sales is the only real behavior that matters, isn't it?)

So giving folks information, or crafting "brand experiences," is only a small portion of this new definition of brands.  It's far bigger than marketing, and far more substantial than a creative campaign. It opens up a lot of resources within a company, not to mention mind power, to come up with newer and more effective ways to get and keep people buying your stuff.

And it provides a simple, obvious litmus test for every expenditure: if it prompts an action, it's worth considering; if all it does is propagate something "out there" that is important to people's thoughts about your brand, think again.

There's no "there" there.  Behavior is what matters. 

CW: How does that work lower down on the marketing food chain? What actions or processes should a solopreneur or small business owner be focusing her marketing efforts around?

JSB: Interestingly, small businesses are naturals for this approach; they do it almost unconsciously, or at least by necessity.  I like to refer to it as "one room marketing," where every member of the company sits around the same table and participates in every decision, irrespective of 'silo' or 'area of expertise' (for solopreneurs, that's easy).  What results is 1) a focus on getting things done, 2) an awareness that unless it not only 'touches' a customer/consumer, but moves her or him closer to purchase, it probably isn't affordable, and 3) an ability to change based on the behavioral reality of the business or the marketplace.

The challenge is to resist the siren call of 'branding' that might redirect some of that focus and money to nonsense ideas like 'building brand equity.'  Small businesses know that brands exist in real-time, and that they have little to do with image...and lots to do with products, services, and relationships.  Lead generation is all about awareness, but to call it 'branding' is a reach. 

CW: So I'm actually being a responsible design consultant when I tell some potential clients they don't need a professionally designed identity or website yet?

JSB: Totally. In a behavioral model, the 'identity' is a culmination of a deep understanding of behaviors (extant and desired, plus a causal map of real actions to move people along to purchase and re-purchase).

A website is a tactic, although a gloriously cool one. I'm sure you've had clients who expected a newly-designed web site would somehow tell, convince, inspire, and sustain a new relationship with customers...and it never works that way, SEO notwithstanding. Really ugly design on top of entirely beautiful behavioral strategy can still work (Amazon, or Google search for that matter). Great design is all the better, but it's not a first step or substitute for smart business strategy.

CW: Can you elaborate a bit on some potential sales closing processes, or even post-sale processes, that might help boost numbers long-term?

Branding Only Works on Cattle cover JSB: Lead generation and sales conversion are really interesting subjects when it comes to the role of branding. Once you start with the proposition that your customers have no relationship with 'your brand,' per se, it starts you on a very useful path.

Consider closing sales: in the traditional brand model, price is somewhat external to the brand proposition...it's the valuation of the benefits, many of which are associative or intangible, that accompany the brand 'promise.' In reality, of course, price is actually what a lot of people care about most, and it usually stands out as one of the only apples-to-apples points that would-be purchasers can compare between choices. Further, in the old model (I'm thinking of the tactic of direct marketing specifically), the idea is that you name a price and hope that it will, with the brand vaguely in the background somehow, prompt a sale.  

I think that's tantamount to asking somebody to marry you the moment you meet them.

CW: Not a very compelling scenario. So as small business owners, how do we rewrite that scenario?

JSB: Closing sales means giving purchasers real, compelling, substantive reasons to buy, and to buy 'now' vs. 'later.' 

If you define your brand as a set of behaviors -- those that you take for your customers, and those which your efforts enable by them -- your branding can be made far more relevant to registering actual sales. You've skipped all of the imagery and ephemera that links your product or service to some abstraction, or claimed things that you hope somehow, someway, sometime your purchasers will remember, care about, and apply to their decision-making. Behaviors are your tools to truly differentiate what you sell, and allow you to integrate price far earlier into your sales close conversation. 

CW: Which translates into action how, exactly?

JSB: Skip 'buying the vague brand promise' and focus on communicating...no, demonstrating...the actual brand value of a relationship with your business, as defined by doing real things that have real value.

I have done a lot of work recently on the idea of 'customer loyalty,' and how it's so fleeting in this day and age. If we see re-purchase/post-sale processes as a set of behaviors, and not the domain for creative content or other intangibles, we are again handed the tools to make long-term relationships with customers meaningful and somewhat sustainable. Think about how many post-sale 'relationships' with businesses default to nothing more than 1) more cross-selling nonsense sent to the customer, 2) thinly-veiled sales promotion campaigns, always trying to upsell good customers, and/or 3) qualitative surveys, frequent purchaser points, or other activities that make the quid-pro quo of selling terribly obvious.

CW: Whereas...?

JSB: A behavioral model would allow you to define your post-purchase relationship in terms of actual things you do for your customers...you could almost quantify these activities and market them up-front as reasons to buy from you. Personal service. Quick issue resolution. Random discounts. Whatever.

CW: You worked for some really big, fancy organizations—Edelman, Grey, Limited Brands—before hanging out your own shingle. What would you say are the most important things to have in place before making the leap to working for yourself?

JSB: Be crazy. Lol...well, actually, be crazy about what you love to do. I'm convinced that going out on your own is dependent on your love for, and the reward you get from, doing whatever it is you want to do. Know it. Believe it, don't just aspire to some ideal future or lifestyle. So talking about having 'passion' is not enough; you really need to have an intimate, real understanding of what makes you tick, and be at peace at the prospect that you could do your own thing, not make a ton of money, and still be very, very happy because of the mere fact that you're doing it.

After that, you need to be very realistic about that money situation. My brand is behavior paradigm suggests that you can't afford to contemplate what would-be clients or customers "should do," or what you intend to tell or "educate" them to do. Understand what they do, pure and simple, and figure out the way(s) your product or service will fit into those behaviors. I've had a lot of start-up clients who were shocked that people didn't grasp (or buy) their newly enhanced whateveritwas they sold. Your marketing will need to communicate not why people should be your customers or clients, but why there's absolutely no good reason why they SHOULDN'T be. SO your plan should be material and obvious, not aspirational.

CW: Fantastic advice, and all too easily ignored in the throes of launch fever. Any parting words of wisdom?

JSB: My last bit of advice would be to remain flexible. If there was one thing I underestimated when I decided to go solo, it was the amount of surprise, if not outright chaos, that would become a regular aspect of my life. If you're the kind of person who doesn't like that, you shouldn't try to be your own boss. On the other hand, the flip-side of that chaos is that you still have control over how you respond to it (or anticipate the next surprise), and it's a very empowering feeling.

* * * * *

Jonathan Salem Baskin, "chief heretic" at Baskin Associates, Inc., has provided branding and marketing consulting to clients across four continents, specializing in translating business strategies into programs that involved more than words and images. You can read more of his fascinating (and insanely well-written) takes on marketing at his blog, Dim Bulb. A practitioner of all he preaches, he also has a business website and actual MUSIC VIDEOS he created as part of the promotion for Branding Only Works on Cattle.

August 06, 2008

Interested in health care marketing?

For anyone working in the health care industry (or marketing their services to the health care industry), check out this recent post from Lisa Neal Gualtieri, Ph.D., Editor-in-Chief of eLearn Magazine (and a reader of this blog) entitled, "Ten Things You Can Do in Ten Minutes to Become a More Connected Healthcare Professional."

(P.S. You might remember our recent post, also inspired by Lisa Neal Gualtieri, "Ten 10-minute Self Promotion Activities.")

August 05, 2008

Work-for-hire: easy money or the devil's handshake?

A new resource popped up via Spencer Cross, principal of L.A.-based design firm Tokyo Farm, and founder of KERNSPIRACY, a mailing list/meatspace mashup of graphic designers, illustrators, web developers and other creative solopreneurs.

It's called StopWorkForHire.com, and, as you might expect, it makes the case against accepting any work-for-hire agreements not just because they stand to screw you out of a lot of deserved income and recognition, but because they undermine the entire profession by devaluing the real work that graphic designers do when they develop designs for clients.

What's different about this site is the how starkly the case is made, and with what a level, clear-headed tone. I especially like the very explicit outlining of what work-for-hire is and, more importantly, is not: there are a lot of shady companies out there who will happily exploit your agreement via signature to a contract that otherwise would not be legally enforceable. Yowsa.

I railed on the KERNSPIRACY list about all this stuff and was kind of shocked that there wasn't more of a lively debate. Usually, people speak pretty passionately about this stuff, on one side or the other. I'm wondering to what I should attribute the radio silence: people thinking it's a non-issue?; not caring?; or maybe that in these especially shaky economic times, it's better to suck it up and take it?

I may be opening the floodgates, here, but hey—what's a blog for? You know where I stand on the issue (and if you don't, well, I signed the pledge against taking work-for-hire); where do you stand, and why?

Let 'er rip in the comments!

August 01, 2008

What’s your favorite business and marketing book?

Do you have a favorite marketing or business book that you love? The one that changes your thinking about your business, the one that had a bunch of A-Ha moments or the one that you keep referring to over and over? We’d like to know! Post your top 3 favorite books here and we’ll compile a list of the most recommended books and post it on our site.

Come on folks, let’s share the love!

July 30, 2008

Mentoring is all the rage

Thanks to good search engine optimization and keyword placement, I was found on the web earlier this year by Fabianne B. Wolff Gershon, Director of The Thypin Oltchick Institute for Women's Entrepreneurship at FEGS.

Fabianne had been searching online for experts to be part of a panel discussion called, "Mentors are the Key to Your Business' Boom." It was held last month in New York and I was flattered to be on a panel with Sheila Wellington, a professor at NYU's Stern School of Business and former President of Catalyst and a colleague I'd lost touch with, Joanna Krotz, business journalist and president of Muse2Muse.

It was interesting to be speaking on the topic of "mentoring" (rather than marketing) and to think about the various types -- formal and informal, short term and long term. We all agreed that, although mentoring is very trendy right now, it's not something to take lightly and requires a strong commitment from both parties. (You can read the summary of the event here.)

Check out their resource-rich, NY-centric Partners page.

This event is also where I met Reg Foster of IBM, who was promoting their new resource web site for small business owners.

July 21, 2008

More goodies from Bizjam

Here's a round-up of a few of the blog posts about Bizjam.

Here's where the speaker presentations (including mine) are posted for all to see
(using this really cool web site.)

And if you're not sure exactly how to do the nitty gritty follow up to a conference like Bizjam, check out this blog post from Judy Dunn, of MarketingYourSmallBiz.com.

Enjoy!

July 09, 2008

HOW Webinars with Jeni Herberger

Our friend, Jeni Herberger, principal of DesignMatters and founder of Big Fish, a creative staffing firm, not to mention an extremely popular speaker on career issues for designers, will be presenting the next series of webinars for HOW Magazine.

The three-part series, "Get Your Design Career on the Right Track," will to help graphic designers chart their career, learn to balance their work and personal lives, and discover how to develop strategic thinking skills. The 3 topics are:

  • Planning Your Design Career (archived already)
  • Designing Your Reality (July 24)
  • Making Yourself "Priceless" in a Crowded Market (August 21)

Plus, they're offering a free "Career Guide" when you register too. And who doesn't love a freebie?

(You might remember the 4-part webinar series on Marketing and Pricing that Peleg and I did recently. They are still archived and available for download, by the way.)

It's all posted on this page.

June 09, 2008

2008 Fees & Pricing trends topline

Our friends over at RainToday.com, an excellent online resource for service businesses and consulting firms, recently issued a report, Fees and Pricing Research Report: Marketing, Advertising, & PR Industry 2008. Here are some highlights from it:

Discounting: Highly Criticized, Yet Highly Used

59% of consulting firms report that they do indeed discount their fees. The most common level of discount offered is between 6 - 10% of originally published or mentioned rates.

The average discount level: 12.8%.

Feepredictions_2 Comment from report authors, Mike Schultz and John Doerr, “If firms held the line on discounting, the additional 12.8% could go straight to their bottom line.

“Not only are there major financial implications to discounting, the discounting discussion shifts the conversation from being about the value the firm provides to being about price. If price is an objection (and it often is) don’t jump straight to cutting price – cut the deliverables and promised outcomes first and the decrease in price will follow (without forfeiting project profitability)."

Prices on the Rise Despite Threats of a Recession

Two-thirds of marketing, advertising, and PR firms have seen their fees for services increase at least somewhat in the past two years and another 76% expect to increase their fees at least somewhat in the next one to two years.

Comment from report authors, Mike Schultz and John Doerr, “Right now, the United States economy is uncertain at best. Yet, even though the economy has slowed, the data suggests that most firms have either not felt a pinch or are not adversely affected by downturns. It will be interesting to see how the next several quarters of U.S. economic growth (or lack thereof) will actually affect fees for marketing, advertising, and PR services.”

More info here.

March 24, 2008

Too little, too late from Starbucks?

Last week in USA Today I stumbled across an interesting article about Starbucks. Most of us never think about the coffee giant as being in trouble or needing to reinvent themselves but that was the underlying theme at their annual meeting in Seattle this past week.

Starbucks' chief Howard Schults took the Steve Jobs approach in trying to inspire his team to focus on the next big thing. What would that be for Starbucks, you might ask? What would be Starbucks’ version of an iPhone or other bit of marketing genius that would increase foot traffic in their stores?

You may think it’s some kind of a new hybrid, "green" coffee bean—I did, too, for a moment. So imagine my surprise when they announced that they are going back to their roots: grinding fresh coffee in each of the stores, introducing a new coffee called “Pike Street Blend” (named after the location of the first Starbucks store), starting a social networking website and implementing a loyalty card program.

It’s clear to me that Starbucks has woken up and realized that they lost the one thing that people were drawn to in the first place, the one thing that made them a huge international success: connecting people. You see, At Starbucks, it’s not about coffee. It’s about creating and maintaining a community.  And that’s what marketing is all about. Creating connections and building a community.  Giving your customers a place where what they buy connects to their core values.

My fear for Starbucks’ strategy is that it may be a little too late. Networking sites, loyalty cards or fresh ground beans have been around for a while now. For Starbucks to position themselves as an industry leader, with new ideas and exciting fresh approaches, this might come off as desperate and could actually be the beginning of the end. I wish their ideas could wow me like Steve Jobs’ and I wish I liked their coffee enough to want to go into one of their stores.

Subscribe!

Google™ search


  • www
    The Marketing Mix

The Tagline Series

Etc.